Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Recitative

Sometimes, words are insufficient.

There are times when I write a piece—usually a longer piece like yesterday’s but sometimes just a poem—that the rhythm and speed of the words is just as important as the words themselves; it’s like rather than writing, I’m composing, and so when the piece goes out into the world I don’t want it to be read so much as performed. What the piece needs is something . . . else, something more. It needs less to have been written than to have been scored, like a piece of music.

Music has the advantage here, and those of you who have learned how to play music know what I mean. A musical score isn’t just the notes that tell you what pitch to play and how long to play them: high, low, short, long. The score is full of other instructions like how loudly to play the note or how softly, whether the notes should all be slurred together or if they should be distinct and separated. It tells us the tempo, and when it should speed up or slow down, hold back, pause, or just freeze under a fermata’s little umbrella. It even tells us the feeling of the section we’re playing, like if it should evoke agitation, sweetness, sadness, grandiosity, gracefulness.

It’s not that I want the piece to be sung; no, it should be spoken (aloud or silently), but as with that last piece, there are sections where it builds in fervor and speed, piling word upon word, crescendo, accelerando, stronger, faster, until bang! hit the sforzando on this word, and then quieter, softer, slower, and . . . breathe.

It’s a frustration not to be remedied, this missing element, especially as I know readers will often skip over sections, miss the rhythm of the words I’ve chosen, skim. Not a criticism. Folks are busy. Life is busy. Time is precious, and even if you grace me with the time to read a piece fully, thoughtfully, there’s no way it’s going to play in your head the way I’ve conducted it in mine. And, sadly, there’s no guarantee that, were I to read it aloud, it would be any better. Composition and performance are two entirely different skills. I’ve attended enough author readings to know this is true.

But, keep it in mind, maybe. Tuck that thought away, and if there’s a piece—a short essay, a vignette, a poem—that really clicks with you, go back to it, maybe even read it aloud, and see if there’s something else, something ephemeral, something hidden in the recitation that is more powerful than what mere words convey.

k

Out of Balance

There are times when something happens, something innocuous, something that, on any other day, would just be a pain or an annoyance but which, on this day, adds to all the invisible things you’ve been avoiding and tips the scales, hitting you hard, harder than seems reasonable, harder than seems rational. But really, it’s not the thing that’s causing it; it’s the collective effect of everything else—the tumult, the tragedy, the futility that surrounds us all—it’s the stuff that’s been building, the leaden weights you’ve been dragging along while you try to manage life, solve the daily problems, keep everything on track, make sure everyone’s needs are met.

And yesterday, that thing happened to me. It was a little thing, a silly little thing. Only it wasn’t little; it didn’t feel little. And it didn’t feel silly.

For a long time, I’ve written letters. To friends, to businesses, to people of note, to sweethearts. And usually, letters come back. I have received replies from presidents and royalty, authors and celebrities, lovers and family and friends. But it’s the writing of those letters that I’ve loved.

About thirty years ago, I discovered the perfect paper. I was in a stationers in downtown Seattle—one of those narrow, cramped shops that seem to have been created along with the building itself—and way in the back, past all the greeting cards and overly ornate stationery, was a selection of papers for writing letters. Shallow boxes with sheets of paper in standard US letter size (8.5″x11″), each set on an angled shelf for display and easy access. I’d never seen the like. All sorts of papers, from onion skin to vellum to parchment to bond weight to card stock, made of cellulose or linen or cotton, each in a variety of finishes, some smooth as silk, and others rough with marks of handiwork and deckled edges.

Enthralled, I reached out tentative fingers to touch them, feel their surfaces, compare one to the next. The snap of the edges, the stiffness of the curl. I found one set, ivory colored (later I learned that “ecru” was the official name for it), with ridges going across the width of each sheet. “Hold it up,” the woman at the back of the shop said. “To the light.” I did, and I saw within the paper, hidden in direct light but revealed as it passed through, the watermark: “Crane’s Crest 100% Cotton”, and vertical lines down the length. The maker’s mark.

I purchased a small bundle of a hundred sheets. On the shallow box it read: Crane & Co.

I knew about Crane & Co., from back in seventh grade when I wrote a report on counterfeiting (heavily plagiarized from Encyclopedia Brittanica). Crane & Co. are the makers of paper used to make U.S. currency. Every dollar bill was printed on paper from Crane & Co., is still being printed on their paper. And it was all made of 100% cotton. I learned about the little red and blue fibers that you could see in the clear spots. I learned about the immensely detailed engraving of each printing blank, about how on the back of a clean five-dollar bill you can read the names of the states on the upper walls of the memorial, and about how on the front of the one-dollar bill, on the escutcheon in the upper right hand corner, in the northwest curve, you can find the little spider that wove the webs that decorate the border of the entire bill. And now I had paper made by the same company, of 100% cotton. It was “laid” paper, which gave it the small but discernible ridges that crossed its width. They used to be an artifact of the process of making the paper by hand, on screened forms, but now the texture was created with plates.

Writing on this paper, though, it was different. The paper had a give to it that other papers did not. And the ridges of the laid finish made writing so easy. When I switched from a ballpoint pen to a fountain pen—I didn’t have a good one, back then, but even so—it was a revelation. The pen and paper seemed to work as a team, with the ink their medium. The ridges encouraged the nib to release the ink and the paper held onto it, just where it went down. It was a tactile experience, but even with the texture of the paper, the nib never caught, the paper rough but smooth with each stroke of the pen.

I bought two full reams of this paper, nearly 1,100 sheets when added to my first purchase, and I have written almost exclusively on this paper for the last thirty years. It was like writing on history, and once I found my perfect fountain pen (Monteverde Innova EF) and the perfect inks (Noodler’s), my letters got longer and longer. Writing letters became a meditation—the ritual of filling the pen, opening the drawer where the paper was stored, selecting the top few sheets, feeling the familiar texture, placing one sheet on the writing block, and beginning to write, “Dear . . .”—that might take a few days to complete, with a couple of hours here, another few there, giving my hand a break to rest and uncramp between sessions.

Until yesterday, when I opened the drawer and only one sheet remained.

Ah, no matter. I’ll order more.

No.

Crane & Co. had been sold, years ago, and was now owned by Monarch, and Monarch no longer made 100% cotton laid letter writing paper. In fact, during my increasingly frantic search, I learned that no one made 100% cotton laid letter writing paper anymore, not Monarch, not Neenah, not the French, not those monks in Belgium, not the old Italian family that’s been making paper since the Medicis ran Florence. Twenty-five percent cotton, yes, I could find that; 100% cotton, no.

I was bereft. Simply bereft. Something had been ripped from me when I wasn’t looking, an essential piece of me, gone.

The wall cracked, then. It broke, tumbled down upon my head, the wall I’d built and buttressed, shored up in the past months. The wall that had kept at bay all my angers. Angers over so many things: over the worsening pain in my hand as I waited six months for my surgery date; over the complicated hoard of emotions that was unearthed after my brother’s recent death; over the constant reminders of mortality not just because people I knew (or knew of) were dying, but because people my age were dying; over the crumbling of my youth; over the accumulation of yahrzeits; over the incredible stupidity of our government; over fears that this is how democracies end; over the incompetence of so-called professionals; over the fact that it’s summer now and I just hate summer.

Over the fact that I could no longer write my letters on Crane & Co. 100% cotton laid writing paper.

A little thing. A silly little thing.

Grief comes in many shapes and sizes and colors and values. It cannot be adequately defined, only estimated. It is a malleable thing, amoebic, capable of joining together small losses—a broken mug, a canceled show, a fragrance discontinued—into a medium-sized sadness, and mid-sized sadnesses into larger heartaches. The way gentle breezes can build to winds and to gusts and then to keening gales and thundering storms. Grief can do that.

Life is loss, some say, and in some ways it is true. But life is also living, and that, I think, is the greater part.

I will rebuild my ritual. A different paper. A different texture. It is, after all, a little thing.

We adapt. We move on.

We live.

k

Main Street, 1976

The last time I walked down the main street in my home town—4th Street in San Rafael—was fifty years ago. It was hot and my heart was hammering as I walked a mile right down the middle of the street, straight through the downtown core. I wasn’t alone.

Behind me was the entire San Rafael High School Marching Band (Go Bulldogs!), and it was the Bicentennial Parade. I can’t tell you what we played. I can’t tell you how we did. I can’t even tell you what time of day or night it was, but what I can tell you is that as drum major, out in front, wearing that white wool uniform and that ridiculously tall fur hat, I was terrified, trying to look all … drum major-y … with the high steps and whistled commands and baton waving, trying to remember all that Char and Jay had taught me about street marching vs field marching, feeling totally out of my depth and hearing a tiny yet insistent voice in my head repeating: Don’t fuck up don’t fuck up don’t fuck up.

All the way down 4th Street.

It was a rocky time for many of us, the Class of ’76. We’d grown up being told, incessantly, that our graduation year would be an Olympics year, a presidential election year, and the Bicentennial year. Woohoo! How great is that?

I’ll tell ya, for me, it didn’t feel all that great. Costs were high, inflation was 6%, gas was still expensive after the embargoes, and the evening news was filled with reports of boycotts and bombs and war. Half of us had spent the past few years worrying about being sent to Vietnam, but late in ’75 the draft/lottery had ended, so we were beginning to breathe a bit easier on that score. Still, as the presidential primaries upped their tempo, memories of Watergate and Nixon’s pardon roiled up old feelings of disillusionment and, as I watched my few friends prepare to depart for their favored universities, I knew I would be staying behind, working part-time while making my way through local college courses with an attitude as grim as my future appeared to be.

Today, as we approach America’s 250th, I sense similar undercurrents of discontent. For those my age, most of us are seeing the progress we made in the last fifty years—as a nation and as a culture—being torn apart and dismembered by those who seem to have aged out of the ideals and promise of our youth. For those who are now the age I was back then, the paths ahead seem even more bleak. For us it was the Population Bomb and DDT; for today’s youth it’s climate change and AI. Where fifty years ago we had Nixon’s “plumbers, Agnew’s extortion, and the fall of Saigon, today we have a blistered carousel of lies, staggering self-dealing, and the Strait of Hormuz.

I wasn’t proud of my country, back in ’76. I’m definitely not proud of it now. We can do, and we deserve, a lot better.

But here’s the thing.

Between 1976 and 2026, there were times when I was proud of my country, times when I actually admired the people in my government and was proud of advances we made. During that time I was also able to find work and advance my own situation. As a skinny-ass senior at SRHS, I had no hope that any of those things might come to pass, and yet they did. Somehow, step by painful step, we were able to make things better, for ourselves and for each other. Sure, the pendulum has swung backward now, and ground has been lost. But not all ground has been lost.

While I didn’t have much hope back then, I was also too young to have seen what Americans can do when we get our hackles up, when things get so bad that we finally raise our heads and take note. That’s when we get creative. That’s when we push back. That’s when we look around, band together, and muster the courage to effect real change.

Today, as we approach our nation’s 250th (sullied as it has become), I believe there is reason to hope. I believe people are beginning to raise their heads and take note.

Time to get our hackles up.

k

 

The Leaving

Sing to me, O Muse, of a complicated man,
this life self-forged through tragic fire,
crafted from scraps of tin and gold,
hammered thin by doom and choice,
quenched to brittleness in acid waters.

Show me how, through the veil of years,
these smoldering bones did carry
the multitude of atoms that both
sparkled and hissed, caressed and raged,
in this single, fractious, chimeric whole.

Write down for me the lines whereby
this fatal journey can be fathomed,
such modes contained and fit to reason
as stern-faced lesson or warning dire and not
chaotic spasms of an indifferent fate.

None of us, not one, are made of stuff so pure
that faults, once sought, remain unfound within our selves,
but if this one soul’s full account of light
can be so nearly blasted through then how did I,
who lived so near and for so long, escape untouched?

Psalmody

crouch down
before the glowing remnants
of the dying world
lay sap-heavy fronds
atop the ashes
inspire smoldering embers
to consume resinous wood

hear the snap
as awakened heat bites
spindles your offering
and ghostly tendrils
acrid sweet and thick
rise and twist
as fire consumes life

reach out
into the smoky column
grab handfuls
of perfumed essence
pull them close
lift them
to heart to throat to hair
bathe in strength released
breathe in this final transmutation

awaken now
renewed refreshed rejuvenated
eat the earth
touch the skies
and with tempered soul
sharpened eye
sinews taut
prepare to protect
the life you would bequeath
to the future

Click-Clack

Most of my friends know that I my musical tastes, while wide-ranging, are rather specific. High on my priority list is musical complexity. I believe this comes from my having spent decades playing in symphonies and orchestras where deep instrumentation and complex forms are more prevalent. For a similar reason, lyrics are low on my list; this is probably because, after spending much of my life sitting in the midst of a hundred musicians, my ear has been trained to hear everything, and I find it exceptionally difficult to pick out the lyrics of songs. In fact, there have been songs that I liked quite well until I learned the lyrics.

As a result, I do not listen to a lot of popular music. The artists that do make it onto my regular rotation have broken through my—I’ll be honest, here—my prejudices. Perhaps it was their virtuosity or the timbre of their voice or the structure of their songs. Often the instrumentation alone will get my attention, and in some cases, it actually is the lyrics that capture me.

In order to stay on my rotation, through, a pop song has to make me feel something special. Joy, power, hope, memories of love, longing, serenity, grief, anger, a hunger for justice, the strength of true friendship. Something. A song must strike a resonant chord within me

That’s a lot of boxes for a song to tick. Probably an unfair amount of boxes. It’s not as though I actively dislike most songs; far from it, in fact. It’s just that not many hit me strongly enough to make me sit up, take note, and go in search of more.

Today, one did just that. It is unusual in many ways. It has a structure that goes well beyond the ABACAB verse/chorus/bridge structure common to pop songs. It incorporates recitative and arioso components, the latter soaring alone or riding atop a percussive ostinato, and the whole is orchestrated with strings, winds, and keyboard. In fact, I’d have to say that it doesn’t even really have a melody, at least nothing you walk away whistling, but rather it moves from motif to motif (I counted at least seven distinct forms). Most importantly, though, and for reasons I couldn’t fathom in the moment, it filled me with a building sense of hope, joy, and release.

That’s a lot of boxes ticked.

It punched right through my barriers, so much so that I went in search of the artist, listened more closely to the lyrics, and checked out a few other titles. I listened to it as a song, watched a stage performance of it, and watched the official music video of it.

Now, I am not gushing over this song because I think you will have a similar reaction. Based on past experience of sharing my faves with friends, I can predict that most likely you will not like it, certainly not as much or for the reasons that I do.

But in this current climate of dread and doom, where it’s difficult to go even two hours without some “breaking news” assaulting us with reports designed to enrage and shock us, I heartily recommend turning off the news and turning on some music.

Find the song that ticks your boxes, whatever they may be. Spend some time with music. You can thank me later.

 

And now, for the curious:

Not Who We Are

When we say that
This is not who we are
it is a lie

It is a lie
either clothed in chosen ignorance
or shrouded in collective aspiration

It is a lie because
we have been
all despised things

We have been
enslavers of millions
slayers of tribes
droppers of atom bombs
poisoners of air and water
oppressors of women
pillagers of nations

We have placed our knees
on necks of every color
at home and abroad
without remorse

We have ignored
friends’ pleas for aid
and denied entry at our borders
to those fleeing the same brand of tyranny
that birthed our nation

It is a lie
of the cruelest kind
when in denial of history
we believe the false is truth
to burnish our vainglory
whilst nodding acceptance
to our forebears’ crimes
absolving them
as ourselves

But even when uttered
swaddled in hope and
dreaming of a brighter future
it remains at its heart a lie
an unsubtle recasting of this moment
as mere aberration
and not the legitimate child
of centuries-long parentage

So do not tell me that
This is not who we are
for unless This is completely new
unseen before today
a crime unique amongst the millions
then it is entirely
who
we
are

Tell me instead
with all knowledge of our past
with all humility for our flaws and sins
with passion born of honest reflection that
This is not who we want to be
for then you will have spoken a truth
and gladly will I add my voice to yours